Dream Believe And Achieve

If U Know Why, How Doesn`t Matter.

Excellence Is Not An Skill, Its An Attitude

If U Know Why, How Doesn`t Matter.

Never...Never...Never...Never...Give Up

If U Know Why, How Doesn`t Matter.

Be the Change, U want to see in others

If U Know Why, How Doesn`t Matter.

Showing posts with label Climate Change. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Climate Change. Show all posts

Monday, 16 November 2015

G 20 Summit : world leaders met after paris attacks



Decoding G-20 summit : Turkey 2015   ......




The Group of Twenty or G-20 is a group of twenty largest economies of the world. It was established in 1999 in the wake of financial crisis of late 1997 and in response to the growing recognition that the key-emerging market countries were not adequately included in the process of global economic discussion and governance. The Group assumes significance as it represents 90 per cent of the global GDP and two-thirds of the world’s population.

With the conclusion of Antalya Summit 2015(Nov 15-16), the G-20 has adopted a comprehensive agenda, which revolves around three I’s – implementation, investment, and inclusiveness. Implementation of past commitments, boosting investment as a driver of growth and promoting inclusiveness in actions so that all can share the benefits.

Terrorism:

As the Paris attacks took over the G-20 summit's agenda, leaders of the member states vowed in a joint statement Monday to take a stronger stance against terrorism. The statement said ” We condemn, in the strongest possible terms, the heinous terrorist attacks in Paris on 13 November and in Ankara on 10 October. They are an unacceptable affront to all humanity. We reaffirm that terrorism cannot and should not be associated with any religion, nationality, civilization or ethnic group.”

The G20 has also emphasized its concern over the acute and growing flow of foreign terrorist fighters and the threat it poses for all states and resolved to tackle this through operational information sharing, border management and criminal justice response. The Group also reiterated their resolve to work together to prevent and suppress terrorist acts through increased international solidarity and cooperation, in full recognition of the UN’s central role.


Earlier Mr.Modi demanded that the G20 push for stronger coordinated global action for putting an end to finance supplies and communication channels of terrorists and an early adoption of the Comprehensive Convention on International Terrorism but there is nothing concrete on terrorism as such except some bold announcements in the joint statement on fight against terrorism and asking the Financial Action Task Force to report back on the steps countries are taking to address the weaknesses identified to cut off terrorism-related financial flows.

It is also very important that all the response in view of  terrorist activities would look for solutions and in no way fuel the sense of alienation and vengeance among nationals of the country where terrorist organizations flourish.


Economic Takeout's:

Recognizing the fact that economic growth is uneven and continues to fall short of expectations, the Group has vowed to implement sound macroeconomic policies in a cooperative manner to achieve strong, sustainable and balanced growth. Against the concerns about the spillover effects of the unconventional policies, also raised by Mr.Modi, the Group pledged to carefully calibrate and clearly communicate their actions, to mitigate uncertainty, minimize negative spillovers and promote transparency. Inclusion of measures to support demand and structural reforms to lift growth, create jobs, promote inclusiveness and reduce inequalities, in the growth strategies would be crucial in fulfilling our commitments, the communiqué said.

The Group remains committed to achieve their ambition to lift collective G20 GDP by an additional 2 percent by 2018 as announced in Brisbane last year. For boosting investment, the Group has developed country specific investment strategies and an analysis of these strategies by the OECD indicates that it would contribute to lifting the aggregate G20 investment to GDP ratio, by an estimated 1-percentage point by 2018.

At a time when plurilateral trade agreements (like TPP) threatening the existence of multilateral trade system, the Group reaffirms the importance of WTO and committed themselves to ensure that all these regional, bilateral and plurilateral trade agreements are consistent under WTO rules. This declaration will definitely lower the concerns of the nations left out in plurilateral trade agreements.

In order to modernize the international tax rules to avoid cross border tax evasion, the Group has endorsed the OECD report on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting and urged all the member countries for its timely implementation. The Group has also expressed their commitment towards enhancing the transparency of their tax systems and to initiate information exchange on-request as well as to automatic exchange of information by 2017 or end-2018.

Although the communiqué talks about disappointment in the delay in implementing the IMF quota reforms agreed in 2010 but it is perhaps the first visible failure of G20. This has reduced the credibility of G-20 as a premium forum for international economic cooperation.


Sustainability Reassured :

In line with Mr.Modi’s call on the G20 to prioritize effective implementation of Sustainable Development Agenda 2030, the communiqué said, “We are strongly committed to implementing its outcomes to ensure that no-one is left behind in our efforts to eradicate poverty and build an inclusive and sustainable future for all.” In order to support sustainable development, the Group will focus on areas such as energy access, food security and nutrition, human resource development, quality infrastructure, financial inclusion and domestic resource mobilization. The communiqué has recognized private players has a strong role to play in poverty eradication and development and stressed the need for all stakeholders to work together in order to promote opportunities for low income people and communities to participate in markets as buyers, suppliers and consumers.

Earlier, speaking at BRICS leaders meeting, Mr.Narendra Modi sought a definite timeline before 2030 for reduction in cost of transferring money, a move that will help India, as it is the world's largest recipient of remittances. Though the communiqué talks about reducing the transaction cost to 5 percent from 7.5 percent but it is silent on a definite timeline.

In the field of energy, the Group has endorsed the G20 Energy Access Action Plan: Voluntary Collaboration on Energy Access, the first phase of which focuses on enhancing electricity access in Sub-Saharan Africa where the problem is most acute.


Climate Change:

Accepting climate change as one of the greatest challenges of our times, the communiqué said, ”We affirm that the Paris agreement should be fair, balanced, ambitious, durable and dynamic. We underscore our commitment to reaching an ambitious agreement in Paris that reflects the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities and respective capabilities, in light of different national circumstances. We commit to work together for a successful outcome of the COP21.”


Refugee Crisis:

Recognizing the refugee crisis as global concern with major humanitarian, political, social and economic consequences, the Group has identified a need for a coordinated and comprehensive response to tackle this crisis, as well as its long-term consequences. The importance of political solutions to conflicts and increased cooperation for development has also been emphasized. But after the attacks in Paris, there is a fear that public opinion over refugee asylum in European countries would be hardened and it wont be easy for the authorities to make a bold accommodative decision.


Conclusion:

Albeit, the summit ended with all the positive statements but it is imperative for the meaningful existence of this group that honest efforts should be made with all sincerity to implement all decisions in letter and spirit. Else, G20 is bound to loose its charm and influence over the issues, which assumes global significance.

All eyes for the implementation of the measures included in the communiqué.



written by - Shobhit Anand

Thursday, 10 October 2013

Business Externalities & Sustainability Contnd...Filthy Race of Carbon Emissions!!



CLIMATE CHANGE AND INDIA

Who’s Looking at the Climate?

US, Europe and China have clear plans based on carbon budgets, the new currency of climate change talks. How about India ?


IT WAS LARGELY DECIDED IN THE WEE hours of the morning, after intense discussions, only a few hours before the report was released. Late last month, the Inter-governmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) meeting in Stockholm announced a carbon budget for the planet, a maximum amount of carbon dioxide the world can emit without inviting dangerous climate change.
On the surface it seems like a simple correlation: human beings can emit only another 350 giga tonnes of carbon dioxide if the warming has to be within safe levels of 2 degree centigrade. However, a lot of intricate science went behind this calculation, and it is set to lead to even more intricate political wrangling in the next two years.
The concept of a carbon budget has been around for at least a decade, but it is the first time IPCC has given a number and announced it in strong terms. This budget will form the basis of climate talks from now on, which will culminate in a global treaty to be signed in Paris in December 2015. This new basis is actually advantageous for India, which otherwise has been steadily losing its position in climate talks. However, the government has little time to formulate a clear strategy in terms of carbon budget. “There is a small window to articulate our point of view in the climate talks if we want to shape an agreement for 2015,” says Navroz Dubash, senior fellow at the Centre for Policy Research.
The Need For A Plan
There is a strong reason why IPCC introduced this concept now. Our understanding of the climate system has improved tremendously over the last decade. “In the last six years, our models have been able to link carbon emissions with temperature rise very well,” says Govindaswamy Bala, professor at the Indian Institute of Science and one of the authors of the chapter on carbon budget. Now that there is a carbon budget for the planet, climate talks will veer away from annual emissions to how to share the budget. “The evidence for warming is so strong that governments can no longer be complacent about it,” says Krishna Kumar, professor at the Indian Institute of Meteorology in Pune and a co-author of the summary for policy-makers of the IPCC report.
So the next round of talks, to continue in Warsaw next month, will focus on how this budget is to be shared between countries. This decision would depend on many factors, one of which would be the strength of a country’s arguments. This would, in turn, depend on a clear development and decarbonisation plan prepared by its government. For India, with low accumulated emissions, it is a better deal than one based on annual emissions. But while China, the US and Europe have good plans based on carbon budgets, India is yet to develop one, say officials who have been part of negotiations in earlier climate talks. “If we are silent on the carbon budget issue, we will not have something to put on the table during the talks,” says Mukul Sanwal, former lead negotiator for India and executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Sanwal now teaches climate change politics at the University of Massachusetts in the US.
In the environment ministry, the joint secretary and additional secretary in charge of climate change negotiations were unavailable for comment. Calls and an emailed query to the secretary’s office remained unanswered at the time of going to press.
China Versus India
The Kyoto Protocol, signed by many developed countries in 1990, is now considered a failure as it had no impact on global carbon dioxide emissions. India had been refusing so far to be part of any deal, saying that it has development priorities that would be hurt by serious emission-reduction measures. This position is being gradually weakened over the years as other countries kept increasing the pressure on India. It does not help that climate change was never been a top priority in India, and has almost completely disappeared from the government radar in recent times.
Shyam Saran, former foreign secretary, quit his job in 2010 as special envoy on climate change. Since then, environment minister Jairam Ramesh, who had been driving India’s climate change policy, has also left the ministry. India’s team for climate change negotiations, if it exists in full, has no visible leadership.
While this is a problem, the biggest obstacle would be the absence of a study that linked the country’s development future with a carbon budget, something essential to put forth a strong case at the climate talks. “India’s climate policy has not yet fully come to terms with the carbon budget concept,” says T Jayaraman, professor and dean at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences at Mumbai. Other big emitters had recognised this idea a few years ago. In May 2011, US National Research Council had jointly produced a report on America’s Climate Choices, and it had recognised carbon budgets as a key concept. This preparedness was probably the reason why the US did not oppose the introduction of the carbon budget idea in the IPCC report.
China, with the highest annual emissions, quite clearly gained from a shift away from annual emission reductions. Climate change talks participants also say that China is thoroughly prepared to deal with the carbon budget concept. They also say that both US and China were remarkably quiet during the discussions at the IPCC meeting in Stockholm. Unless India articulates its plans clearly at least 18 months in advance of the treaty, there is no chance of it being heard loudly in these talks. This leaves the country little time to orient national development plans based on a carbon budget. China is expected to complete its major infrastructure projects by 2020, when the treaty is supposed to come into effect. India’s infrastructure development still has a long way to go, and therefore much to lose from a treaty forced on it.
An expert group headed by Kirit Parikh, set up to develop strategies to reduce carbon intensity of the GDP by 25% by 2020, is yet to submit its final report even after three years. In the end, even such reductions may fall far short of the requirements—from a climate change point of view—if the GDP grows well during the next decade.