Dream Believe And Achieve

If U Know Why, How Doesn`t Matter.

Excellence Is Not An Skill, Its An Attitude

If U Know Why, How Doesn`t Matter.

Never...Never...Never...Never...Give Up

If U Know Why, How Doesn`t Matter.

Be the Change, U want to see in others

If U Know Why, How Doesn`t Matter.

Sunday, 20 October 2013

Amazon`s BEZOS Taking Over the Washington Post, Ebay`s OMIDYAR Adventuring into Journalism... Print Media Wheel on the Verge of Reinvention

Amazon`s BEZOS Taking Over the Washington Post, Ebay`s OMIDYAR  Adventuring into Journalism... 

Print Media Wheel on the Verge of Reinvention

eBay Inc founder Pierre Omidyar has become the latest self-made tech baron to plunge into the struggling news industry hot on the heels of Amazon.com founder Jeff Bezos, who just paid $250 million for T h e W a s h i n g t o n P o s t.

 
Bezos stunned the world on Aug. 5 by buying the storied but troubled Washington Post. Woodward and Bernstein’s old stomping ground has suffered a 44 percent drop in revenue over the past six years. In his public apology tour, Donald Graham, the family scion who sold the newspaper and related assets to Bezos, said he could not in good conscience continue to lose his shareholders’ money. Nor could he stomach further diminishing the reputational value of the Post. Something had to give, or in this case, someone: Bezos ponied up $250 million for the rights to Graham’s paradox. That price is 17 times adjusted profit, or about four times what major metro dailies usually fetch.Bezos has always loved the written word. As a child he devoured a library full of science fiction novels near his grandparents’ ranch in Cotulla, Tex., and he’s still a voracious reader who tackles several newspapers a day on his Kindle. Books inspired many of his most important strategic decisions, from Amazon’s origins as an online bookstore to the creation of the Kindle and Amazon Web Services to his cultivation of a frugal, action-oriented corporate culture—principles he plucked right from the autobiography of Sam Walton, the legendary founder of Wal-Mart Stores.
Strategic Investment
A decade ago, frustrated with the pace of meetings at his company, Bezos banished PowerPoint and proclaimed that all future Amazon meetings would begin with the presenter passing out a narrative document that outlined the topic being discussed. The first papers were endless, spanning dozens of pages, so Bezos decreed a six-page limit. Many of his colleagues still thought this managing-by-writing approach would fade. It didn’t. “The truth is that Jeff deeply respects the power of the printed word,” says David Risher, an early Amazon executive.
Reading and writing aren’t just central to Bezos’s management style. His wife, MacKenzie Bezos, is a respected writer who just published her second novel, Traps. He’s not bad at twirling a word himself. Bezos’s annual letters to shareholders are widely read and shared in the business community—to be expected given Amazon’s size and sway. But the prose doesn’t merely stand out on the CEO curve; it’s actually good. From his 2012 letter: “Our passion for pioneering will drive us to explore narrow passages, and, unavoidably, many will turn out to be blind alleys. But—with a bit of good fortune—there will also be a few that open up into broad avenues.”
Bezos has been trying to build editorial businesses within Amazon for years. In the mid-1990s, when his now-quaint ambition was to create the largest bookstore on the Web, Bezos staffed up a large editorial department in an attempt to give Amazon.com the trusted touch of an independent book shop. These writers and editors—many of them former journalists—were eventually downsized during the dot-com bust and amid an acrimonious, internal competition with personalization algorithms. Bezos concluded back then that computers, not people, could more efficiently recommend the products that customers were apt to purchase.
Reinventing the Print Media Wheel
He didn’t give up his dream of developing new forms of media, though. With the rise of the Kindle, Bezos created publishing imprints that encouraged authors to experiment and sell their books directly to readers while collecting an above-average royalty. This was immediately framed by observers as an attack on Amazon’s oldest partners, traditional publishers—and it was, in part. But Kindle Singles, which distributes bite-size novellas, and Kindle Serials, books that are meted out in chapters, have also given writers new ways to find an audience and earn a living. He’s attempting to do something similar with Amazon Studios, which backs original television shows and gives filmmakers an outlet for their work outside the usual Hollywood power structure. Bezos isn’t trying to kill the media business; he’s trying to reinvent it, racing against the likes of Apple (AAPL) and Google (GOOG) to build the most comprehensive array of devices and innovative online news and entertainment services.
 
Unlike Bezos, the French-born Iranian-American Omidyar says he aims to build a new “mass media organisation” from the ground up, and his first recruits are the journalists who exposed the US government’s surveillance programmes, using documents leaked by former spy agency contractor Edward Snowden.
    The new venture puts Omidyar, 46, in the public eye after many years of relatively low-profile philanthropic and investment activities. While he has long supported efforts to promote transparency and accountability in government, including a local news website in his home state of Hawaii, Omidyar suggested that he is prepared to spend as much as Bezos did in buying the P o s t to take those efforts to a new level. “I want to find ways to convert mainstream readers into engaged citizens,” Omidyar wrote in a blog post. Omidyar’s new endeavour, as yet unnamed, will face myriad challenges. Established news organisations are struggling to find a viable financial model as print advertising and circulation plummet while online advertising dollars migrate to Google and to automated ad exchanges that drive prices down. He has yet to offer any clues about his business strategy. Media investments generally do not make good investments, said David Cowan, a partner at Bessemer Ventures. “I’m pretty sure Pierre doesn’t think that a news startup is the best way to get richer,” he said.
Hobby Horse Born in France to Iranian parents, Omidyar grew up largely in the Washington, DC area, with a stint in Hawaii. He graduated from Tufts University near Boston in 1988 with a degree in computer science, and moved to Silicon Valley. While working as a software engineer at then-hot personal-communications company General Magic, Omidyar came up with the idea for eBay in 1995 and worked on it as a hobby until it became big enough for him to quit his day job. When eBay went public three years later, the then 31-year-old Omidyar’s stake was valued at $611 million by the end of the trading day. He still owns almost 9% of the $70-billion company today, making him eBay’s top shareholder. Forbes pegs his wealth at $8.5 billion. Omidyar serves as eBay’s chairman, but has not been involved in its day-to-day operations for years. During the summer, Omidyar considered purchasing T h e Wa s h i n g t o n P o s t, he wrote in his blog. While the P o s t eventually sold to Bezos in August, the process “got me thinking about what kind of social impact could be created if a similar investment was made in
something entirely new, built from the ground up,” he wrote. Those musings led to his latest project, which he is billing as “My Next Adventure in Journalism.”
Passionate about Journalism Omidyar Network, the investment firm founded by Omidyar and his wife, Pam, in 2004, has backed some 25 organisations dealing with news and government transparency, including News Trust, a news-discovery site run by the non-profit journalism centre the Poynter Institute; the Sunlight Foundation, a government-transparency nonprofit; and Transparency & Accountability Initiative, a Londonbased organisation. “Pierre gets journal
ism,” said John Temple, founding editor of Honolulu Civil Beat, the news site launched by Omidyar in 2010. “He’s passionate about it and knows how to create an environment and culture where journalists feel energised and empowered.” Omidyar’s comments on Twitter in recent months show an increasing discomfort with the workings of the US government. “There goes freedom of association,” he tweeted earlier this week, linking to an article in T h e Wa s h i n g t o n P o s t about the National Security Agency collecting email address books.
    But in his Wednesday blog post, Omidyar emphasised his new endeavour would go beyond investigative reporting, and would “cover general interest news, with a core mission around supporting and empowering independent journalists across many sectors and beats.”
    That broad approach makes sense, said Arianna Huffington, creator of the H u f f i n g t o n P o s t, which started an edition in Hawaii earlier this year through a partnership with Omidyar’s Civil Beat. “He wants this to be a business, and that’s not possible without having a site that’s about general news and everything that people are interested in,” H u f f i n g t o n said in an interview. “And for the conclusions of investigative journalism to have impact – and he wants to have impact – you have to capture the public imagination. If you have people coming to the site for other reasons, they are more likely to engage.”
Civil Beat To some extent, Omidyar seems to be shifting what he has been trying with Honolulu Civil Beat to a broader stage. Civil Beat aimed to create a new online journalism model with paid subscriptions and respectful comment threads. Patti Epler, current editor of Civil Beat, said a policy of requiring people to log in via Facebook before they post a comment has encouraged a less strident tone than at many news organisations. She declined to comment on the site’s finances.
    Her boss has championed projects that might lead to more government transparency, Epler said. When her reporters ran up against a law exempting police from releasing internal disciplinary records, Omidyar created the Civil Beat Law Center, which is working to secure the release of those records. Another impetus for starting the centre was the demise of Hawaii’s shield law, which protects journalists from having to reveal anonymous sources, Epler said. It expired earlier this year.
    Omidyar frequently drops by the newsroom, where he edits the occasional article, plays foosball and chats with staff. “He loves to talk stories,” Epler said. “And journalistic principles and ethics.”


Ref: ET, Washington post

Saturday, 19 October 2013

Economics : Nobel Prize on Trendspotting in asset markets

US trio Lars Peter Hansen, Eugene Fama and Robert Shiller wins Nobel Economics Prize


US trio Lars Peter Hansen, Eugene Fama and Robert Shiller won the Nobel Economic Prize this week for groundbreaking work on spotting trends in asset markets.

The three have laid the foundation for the current understanding of asset prices. It relies in part on fluctuations in risk and risk attitudes, and in part on behavioural biases and market frictions.

Fama and Hansen are both professors at the University Of Chicago, while Shiller is a professor at Yale University in Connecticut. 




The economics prize is the only Nobel not originally included in the last will and testament of the prizes' creator, Swedish scientist and philanthropist Alfred Nobel.

It was established in 1968 by the Swedish central bank to celebrate its tri-centenary, and first awarded in 1969. The other prizes have been awarded since 1901.

Americans have dominated the list of economics laureates, with 17 out of 20 laureates coming from the US in the past 10 years.

Last year, US scholars Alvin Roth and Lloyd Shapley won for their work on the functioning of markets and how best to match supply and demand.

The economics prize winds up this year's Nobel season, marked by awards in physics to the fathers of the Higgs Bosson, the literature prize to Canadian short story author Alice Munroe, and the peace prize to the UN-backed Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemicals Weapons. 

In praise of empiricism: a Nobel prize for everyday economics

Fama, Shiller and Hansen are worthy winners for focusing on the messy reality of market behaviour, rather than abstract theories

 

Eugene Fama: The man who won the Nobel memorial award in economics, discovered years ago that stockpicking was a fool's game; you can't really beat the market. An entire industry of index funds exists because of Fama's research.
His two co-winners are also men who care what happens in the real world. Economics has a reputation as wonky, nerdy discipline that loves theories that are pure and distant from humanity, like cottony clouds, and hates to get its hands dirty with real-world concerns. This year's Nobel prize in economics is finally, a victory for the study of human nature.
The three winners this year – Eugene Fama, Robert Shiller and Peter Lars Hansen – study stock and bond markets and the abnormal psychology of bubbles, and why we fail to pick stocks. They are interested in numbers, yes, but mostly, they are interested in how real people behave under financial stress. Fama said :
Finance drew me in because it's so fundamental to human activity. It follows precise mathematical relations but there's an element of imprecision that reflects human nature.
One winner, Robert Shiller, created an influential housing index. He is known for spotting bubbles early. The other winner, Lars Peter Hansen, found new ways of thinking about stocks and risk. And Fama showed that investors can't really beat the market in the short term; when you invest in an S&P 500 index fund, you're making use of his work, just as I did. A colleague at the University of Chicago said during the ceremony that Fama had had "a phenomenal impact on the practical world and people's lives."
Fama, Hansen and Shiller have often disagreed about the specifics of how the real world works. Fama has said he doesn't believe in bubbles; Shiller, who wrote the book Irrational Exuberance, spots them. But what unites them is that these are three men who aren't looking for the perfect world. They're happy to figure out a world in which orderly spreadsheets of numbers are overwhelmed by the venal, panicky, chaotic tendencies of humanity in a crisis.
This is the kind of economics we need more of: the kind that speaks to us. With the financial crisis and recession, economics are part of our daily lives. The unemployment rate, housing sales, mortgage lending rates … we all live with these numbers weekly, in our communities and in our wallets. Those numbers are part of the study of economics. They also describe the world we live in.
A lot of economics, however, depends on unreliable numbers. It's not about the cold, hard truth. When we talk about the unemployment rate, for instance, we're not really talking about how many people are unemployed in the country. It's an educated guess, based on a survey of companies and a survey of people. It's also often wrong the first time, and needs to be revised multiple times before it's right. The same goes for a range of other economic data, like GDP.
That's why it was so important that the Nobel committee praised Shiller, Fama and Hansen for their empirical work. Empirical means they are trying to get a numerical sense of the real world. They are working on ways to measure our economic behavior more accurately, and to help us understand ourselves better in the process.
The very premise of most economic theory is that we all exist in a perfect world where people make rational choices, a world of neat levers and switches. It's orderly, but it's not exactly accurate. This year's three winners show us that economics does not exist in a perfect world, a soundproof chamber, but instead, in the irrational, unpredictable scrum of humanity.


Ref: ET, The Guardian & Google.

Janet Yellen: The next US Federal Reserve chief

Janet Yellen: The next US Federal Reserve chief

President Obama will nominate US Federal Reserve number two Janet Yellen as the next governor of the world's biggest central bank. More of a monetary dove than even outgoing governor Ben Bernake, Yellen's appointment will come as a big boost for India, struggling to raise foreign flows to fund its high current account deficit. ET takes a look at what the appointment of Yellen, 67, who will be the first woman chairman of the Fed in its 100-year history, means for India.


Now: Vice chairwoman of the US Federal Reserve since October 2010 Professor emeritus at the University of California at Berkeley.

Earlier: President & CEO of the Twelfth District Federal Reserve Bank, San Francisco. Member of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Served in Clinton administration as Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers. Economist with the Federal Reserve's Board of Governors. Faculty of the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Academic background: PhD in Economics from Yale University. Co-authored The Fabulous Decade: Macroeconomic Lessons from the 1990s.

Personal: Married to George Akerlof: Winner of Economics Nobel in 2001. 


Ref: ET

Saturday, 12 October 2013

Deepika Padukone: The Lady of the Moment On The Go... Yeh Leela Aprampar Hai!!


Deepika Padukone: The Lady of the Moment On The Go... 

Attains no. 1 position in Times Celebex , Turns Choreographer And Fashion Designer, A Flawless Transition of Veronica into the Beautiful Leela with the same poise and grace...
She has been sculpted by Aphrodite herself. Her long legs, perfect curves and tall frame leave women envious. Even mannequins aren’t as flawless as Deepika Padukone. Deepika Padukone could probably have made it to the screen on looks alone. The camera embraces her. Many women would kill for her slender, fashion-model figure, oval face, porcelain skin and those high, exquisite cheekbones. Her eyes mirror intelligence; their sparkle demands the use of an adjective: dazzling. Only a slight bump down the plane of her long, patrician nose stands between her profile and perfection.Yet she is more than just another gorgeous face. With lightning speed, she has emerged as the most riveting and versatile performer of her generation.This fashion deity enjoys being under the spotlight. Designers love to style her because she can pull off the most outrageous fashion with panache. But her personal style is simple. She can ooze tons of sex-appeal in a plain white tee, blue denims and Kolhapuri chappals. Surely, it’s the personality that works. Not what she flaunts. Online shopping, wardrobe swapping, colour coordination are just cogs running the glam show reel of this fashionista.In her introspective moments it seems as if the walls of her well-constructed edifice will tumble down with an ignominious crash.

 In the recently released song titled 'Nagada Sang Dhol Baje' from Ram Leela, Deepika brings back the garba to Bollywood.  Deepika looks stunning in the red lehenga that she has donned for the garba and has also done a brilliant job by giving a helping hand for the choreography. Apart from all this grooving , there were reports that she was involved in serious research at Milan's creative arts university — Academia Di Brera. Known for her minimal yet classy dressing, the Bangalore model-turned-Bollywood actress now debuts as a fashion designer as she co-creates and unveils this season's Women's Limited Edition collection exclusively for Van Heusen.With Deepika on board, the line goes a notch higher with its trendsetting designs in couture spirit. Pegged around old Hollywood gloamour, classic meets contemporary is the overarching look of the collection. The palate features monochromatic shades for the uber chic, dusty rose pinks for sensual women, cobalt blue for trendsetters and more, which adds appeal to the creation.

 Over the years, audiences looking back will remember a few heroines who took their breath-away, everything from the way they looked to the way they went about their mundane chores on-screen to the way they danced - their smiles lighting up the screen, these heroines presented as visual poems, unfailingly resplendent inspiring women with uncompromising individuality, remembered much after till eternity.Director Sanjay Leela Bhansali aso, known for his larger-than-life films, exemplary sets, high-tempo emotions and most of all for the way he presents his film's leading ladies promises audiences this time around, Deepika Padukone aka Leela, in her most beautiful yet. As natural and real as possible with minimalist make-up and an undone light bouffant, the look of a local Gujarati girl, Leela is looking beautiful, graceful but teekhi! She is colour... She is fire...
 In Om Shanti Om, Deepika Padukone steps out of a fancy yellow car and walks the red carpet of her movie's premiere, smiling and waving at a massive crowd of her awe-struck admirers. From a rank newcomer playing a superstar to becoming one of Bollywood's topmost heroines, the stunner from Bengaluru has come a long way in almost six years. 


There's a lot to dig about this leggy beauty.  

1. She's HOT. And knows it too. 
The Love Aaj Kal star is textbook attractive. She's got it all -- fabulous figure, gorgeous face, long, long, long legs and, most importantly, truckloads of poise. 
2. D for Deepika. D for Dimples.
Bollywood has a weakness for dimpled celebrities. From Sharmila Tagore to Shah Rukh Khan, that cutesy hollow that form on their cheeks with every smile is always a pleasant visual. Deepika is no exception. Her dimples unquestionably add to her darling quotient.

3. The Dedicated Professional.
Not many actors are able to dissociate their personal equations with their professional lives and hurt their career in the process.  But Deepika Padukone is too wise to make such blunders. Also impressive is the grace with which she made Yeh Jawaani Hai Deewani with former beau Ranbir Kapoor. The ex-lovers conducted themselves with so much dignity, many noted how wonderful it is to see this mature facet of modern-day relationships. 
4. The Effortless Style Icon 
Western, traditional, fusion, sexy, cute, bohemian, nerdy, vintage, grunge, glam, is there any look Deepika cannot pull off? No wonder this elegant clothes horse is a designer's favourite showstopper and magazine's frequent cover girl.   
5. Cool and classy! 
In an industry bursting with inflated egos or vain fashionistas, it's nice to witness Deepika Padukone's simple, steadfast values, grounded manners and accessible persona.She takes criticism in her stride, acknowledges her limitations and strives to work hard at getting better. She handles praise with equal composure. She's bighearted enough to let bygones be bygones.


Retail Disruption : Changing Landscape of Retail Industry in India



Retail Disruption : Changing Landscape of Retail Industry in India

Bharti-Walmart parting ways turning the heat on to all the players of the Industry which is on the verge of Re-shaping. In the midst of all, our Indian hero of Retailing, our own Kishore Biyani, with his newest format, is looking to marry the reach of the neighbourhood store with the weight of the Big Bazaar brand to home deliver goods and discounts. If it goes right, it can be very right. If it goes wrong, it can hurt the mother brand...


 FIVE YEARS AGO, THE ELDER daughter of India’s retail man Kishore Biyani, had an idea to take all the promotional and discount deals offered by Big Bazaar, their flagship retail store, and pack it all into an outlet in areas not serviced by organised retail. Thus Future group, led by Ashni Biyani, set up a 600 sq ft store called Big Bazaar Best Deals in Mumbra, a suburb of Thane in Maharashtra, and started offering deals—in store, through a catalogue and via online retailing.
That idea did not gain traction, but it has spawned another idea five years on: Big Bazaar Direct, which marries the reach of the neighbourhood store with the weight of the Big Bazaar brand and the convenience of technology to home deliver goods and discounts. At its launch late last month, Kishore Biyani, CEO of Future Group, said: “If it works, it will be bigger than Big Bazaar”.
The operative words here are two: ‘bigger’ and ‘if’. Big Bazaar is a Rs 11,000 crore operation, the mainstay of the Future Group, and the new business is essentially looking to leverage that brand name. After spending much of the last 18 months on defence, selling pieces of his debt-laden retail empire, Biyani is back doing what he knows best: playing offence, testing another retail format. “I am confident about this one,” he says. “We are venturing into this after making most of the mistakes in the world.”
Big Bazaar Direct (BBD) is the first of its kind, at least in India. Even competitors are admiring it for intricacies and ingenuity. They are watching keenly, but holding back judgement to see how it is execution unravels. “The idea is very solid, ambitious and very interesting,” says the CEO of a competing food and grocery retail chain, not wanting to be named.
One man who has seen it from closer quarters, even shaped parts of it, is Damodar Mall. Till mid-2013, the chief customer strategy officer of Reliance Retail was in the Future Group. Mall was a close aide of Biyani and he even worked with 28-year-old Ashni on the Big Bazaar Best Deals concept. “If one gets it right, it can be very right,” he says. “But if it goes wrong, it can hurt the mother brand.”
The Concept
BBD invites people -- anyone from shopkeepers to insurance agents -- to become its franchisee by paying a deposit of Rs 3 lakh. Say, your local chemist becomes a franchisee. At your calling, the chemist will come home with a tablet, which has a listing of Big Bazaar products that have deals on them. You can see the deals and the chemist enters your order on his tablet. Instantly, this is transmitted to the BBD back office, and you receive an SMS. You pay the franchisee cash for the order, which is also acknowledged via SMS. The franchisee’s job ends there. Your order is now with Big Bazaar, which home delivers it in three to seven days. “We have realised that, even today in India, human intervention is required in e-commerce,” says Biyani. Daughter Ashni calls it “aided e-commerce”.
The BBD model, thus, is tying to join many dots by making it a win-win-win proposition. The customer, sitting at home, gets goods from Big Bazaar, at its prices and discounts. The franchisees earn a commission on sales for simply going door-to-door and punching orders on a tablet. The company gets a new sales force, one that capitalises on its local knowledge and contacts, and adds ballast to the Big Bazaar engine without the burden of organising working capital.
Biyani is leading this project himself, along with the Future Group’s start-up team. Flanking him are Vivek Biyani, his nephew, and a panel of five entrepreneurs who have worked with Biyani closely over the years. Rakesh, Biyani’s cousin and the other senior promoter, is involved in the project to the extent that the technology piece reports to him. According to Biyani, a central thought behind BBD was their reading that Big Bazaar, today, has a greater mind share than market share. In other words, more people know about it than who visit it —primarily because a store is not in their town or is not close enough. BBD aims to bring Big Bazaar home. “Big Bazaar touches around 35-40% of the Indian population today,” says Biyani. “BBD will be able to touch at least 70% of the population.”
The New Partners
The franchisees will have to enable that touch. BBD has launched in Nagpur (where Big Bazaar has its national warehouse) and Amravati, both in Maharashtra, where it signed up 15 franchisees. Next up: Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Mumbai and the National Capital Region. “The fulfilment should be checked in one market first before the scale-up happens,” cautions Mall.
BBD is currently inviting franchisee applications. According to Abhay Kumar, one of the five entrepreneurs, the applicants include kirana stores, homemakers, chemists, insurance agents and beauticians. But it’s not as if anyone who pays Rs 3 lakh will become a franchisee. The group of five entrepreneurs will vet and decide. This group is also selling BBD. So, for instance, it has targeted an interaction with 4,600 prospective franchisees in October across BBD’s upcoming markets.
After the interaction and initial screening, this team meets with applicants in their operating locality to get a sense of them, their business and customer profile. “The biggest criteria we are seeking in our franchisees is entrepreneurship, their ability to collect customers,” says Abhay Kumar, a fabric distributor and garment manufacturer who has been doing business with Biyani for 27 years, and is part of the group of five.
According to Biyani, five things need to fall in place: product, brand, franchisees, technology and supply chain. The most critical and the biggest challenge, he adds, are the franchisees, who stand to earn 7-9% of the value of the goods sold through them. “They have to buy into the idea…and I am banking on them to sell the idea,” says Biyani. “And believe me, the entrepreneurs who come and meet me ask a million questions about the venture. Their sign-in is not that easy.”
The Flip Side
Harminder Singh of Wazir Advisor, a retail advisory firm, feels the “biggest flaw” in the BBD model is the franchisee strategy. “Big Bazaar is not a business that has high margins. So, a partner may get impatient quickly,” says Singh, founder and managing director, Wazir. “The partner is an individual with a mind of his own. To have control over one’s business model is a better idea.”
Hasmukh B Rambhia, president of Mumbai Suburban Grain & Provision Dealers, a group of kirana stores in Mumbai, seconds that thought. “Maybe some years down the line, when modern retail distribution becomes stronger, it will make business sense to partner big retailers,” he says. “Today, local players have to play to their strengths, of the convenience of buying daily grocery products.”
While a Big Bazaar store stocks, on an average, 30,000-40,000 products, BBD will offer 1,800 products in several categories, including non-food, apparel and accessories, furniture and home furnishing, packaged foods and electronics. It plans to keep adding products in time, and also offer foods and grocery, the back-end for which it is working on. It is also looking to reduce delivery time, the eventual aim being same-day delivery.
While the sourcing team for the store and home delivery formats are the same, there are two separate teams on the supply side. “What deal entrepreneurs get will depend, to a large extent, on the supply chain and service levels,” says Mall. “The machinery will have to deliver reliably given that it is a hi-tech business.” Adds Wazir: “If there are inconsistent supplies in a form that the Sahara Group experienced, customers will stop shopping.” And, as Mall says, the resultant backlash could even hurt the mother Big Bazaar brand.
The CEO of a rival firm quoted earlier says it will be an execution challenge to have several hundred diverse entrepreneurs buy into the same idea. “But then that is Biyani’s approach right from day one,” he says. “He hasn’t been afraid to take risks at all.”  

How Big Bazaar Direct Works
 
STEP 1 Your local shopkeeper becomes a Big Bazaar Direct franchise by paying 3 lakh  
STEP 2 At your calling, he comes home and takes your order on his tablet, & takes cash  
STEP 3 He transfers your order, via Internet, to Big Bazaar  
STEP 4 Big Bazaar delivers home in 3-7 days  

How They Gain Franchisees  
 BIG BAZAAR brand gets him sales EARNS 7-9% commission on sales ZERO INVENTORY, zero working capital
Consumers
BIG BAZAAR products and discounts, home delivered
CREDIT CARDS or Internet access not needed
Big Bazaar
NEW SALES channel
REACH customers it can’t physically service
LEVERAGE local connect of franchisees to acquire customers
What Can Go Wrong
Delay and errors in delivering goods to consumers
Uneven consumer experience can hurt the Big Bazaar brand
Revenue generation for franchisees not in line with their investment


Ref: ET

Thursday, 10 October 2013

Business Externalities & Sustainability Contnd...Filthy Race of Carbon Emissions!!



CLIMATE CHANGE AND INDIA

Who’s Looking at the Climate?

US, Europe and China have clear plans based on carbon budgets, the new currency of climate change talks. How about India ?


IT WAS LARGELY DECIDED IN THE WEE hours of the morning, after intense discussions, only a few hours before the report was released. Late last month, the Inter-governmental Panel for Climate Change (IPCC) meeting in Stockholm announced a carbon budget for the planet, a maximum amount of carbon dioxide the world can emit without inviting dangerous climate change.
On the surface it seems like a simple correlation: human beings can emit only another 350 giga tonnes of carbon dioxide if the warming has to be within safe levels of 2 degree centigrade. However, a lot of intricate science went behind this calculation, and it is set to lead to even more intricate political wrangling in the next two years.
The concept of a carbon budget has been around for at least a decade, but it is the first time IPCC has given a number and announced it in strong terms. This budget will form the basis of climate talks from now on, which will culminate in a global treaty to be signed in Paris in December 2015. This new basis is actually advantageous for India, which otherwise has been steadily losing its position in climate talks. However, the government has little time to formulate a clear strategy in terms of carbon budget. “There is a small window to articulate our point of view in the climate talks if we want to shape an agreement for 2015,” says Navroz Dubash, senior fellow at the Centre for Policy Research.
The Need For A Plan
There is a strong reason why IPCC introduced this concept now. Our understanding of the climate system has improved tremendously over the last decade. “In the last six years, our models have been able to link carbon emissions with temperature rise very well,” says Govindaswamy Bala, professor at the Indian Institute of Science and one of the authors of the chapter on carbon budget. Now that there is a carbon budget for the planet, climate talks will veer away from annual emissions to how to share the budget. “The evidence for warming is so strong that governments can no longer be complacent about it,” says Krishna Kumar, professor at the Indian Institute of Meteorology in Pune and a co-author of the summary for policy-makers of the IPCC report.
So the next round of talks, to continue in Warsaw next month, will focus on how this budget is to be shared between countries. This decision would depend on many factors, one of which would be the strength of a country’s arguments. This would, in turn, depend on a clear development and decarbonisation plan prepared by its government. For India, with low accumulated emissions, it is a better deal than one based on annual emissions. But while China, the US and Europe have good plans based on carbon budgets, India is yet to develop one, say officials who have been part of negotiations in earlier climate talks. “If we are silent on the carbon budget issue, we will not have something to put on the table during the talks,” says Mukul Sanwal, former lead negotiator for India and executive secretary of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Sanwal now teaches climate change politics at the University of Massachusetts in the US.
In the environment ministry, the joint secretary and additional secretary in charge of climate change negotiations were unavailable for comment. Calls and an emailed query to the secretary’s office remained unanswered at the time of going to press.
China Versus India
The Kyoto Protocol, signed by many developed countries in 1990, is now considered a failure as it had no impact on global carbon dioxide emissions. India had been refusing so far to be part of any deal, saying that it has development priorities that would be hurt by serious emission-reduction measures. This position is being gradually weakened over the years as other countries kept increasing the pressure on India. It does not help that climate change was never been a top priority in India, and has almost completely disappeared from the government radar in recent times.
Shyam Saran, former foreign secretary, quit his job in 2010 as special envoy on climate change. Since then, environment minister Jairam Ramesh, who had been driving India’s climate change policy, has also left the ministry. India’s team for climate change negotiations, if it exists in full, has no visible leadership.
While this is a problem, the biggest obstacle would be the absence of a study that linked the country’s development future with a carbon budget, something essential to put forth a strong case at the climate talks. “India’s climate policy has not yet fully come to terms with the carbon budget concept,” says T Jayaraman, professor and dean at the Tata Institute of Social Sciences at Mumbai. Other big emitters had recognised this idea a few years ago. In May 2011, US National Research Council had jointly produced a report on America’s Climate Choices, and it had recognised carbon budgets as a key concept. This preparedness was probably the reason why the US did not oppose the introduction of the carbon budget idea in the IPCC report.
China, with the highest annual emissions, quite clearly gained from a shift away from annual emission reductions. Climate change talks participants also say that China is thoroughly prepared to deal with the carbon budget concept. They also say that both US and China were remarkably quiet during the discussions at the IPCC meeting in Stockholm. Unless India articulates its plans clearly at least 18 months in advance of the treaty, there is no chance of it being heard loudly in these talks. This leaves the country little time to orient national development plans based on a carbon budget. China is expected to complete its major infrastructure projects by 2020, when the treaty is supposed to come into effect. India’s infrastructure development still has a long way to go, and therefore much to lose from a treaty forced on it.
An expert group headed by Kirit Parikh, set up to develop strategies to reduce carbon intensity of the GDP by 25% by 2020, is yet to submit its final report even after three years. In the end, even such reductions may fall far short of the requirements—from a climate change point of view—if the GDP grows well during the next decade.